Blog 3 Reference Materials
Retrieved from Google |
Reference material access have come a long way since my experience in a traditional library as an elementary high school student using card catalogues and the duodecimal system. When I think back to when I started university more then two
decades ago I remember being so overwhelmed transitioning from card catalogues to online databases
searches through my school electronic library interface. I would go on the interface and at that time I would have no idea what to
put in the search. What special symbols and words do I use to
narrow down searches. As a new student I think it would be beneficial to offer a course on how to use the libraries interface. Teaching students how to find articles or books for any assignment and the difference of a “bibliographic control [to] access information: bibliographic access (does the
work exist?) and physical access (where can the work be found?)” (Riedling,
pg.29).
The evolution of access to information has grown so rapidly in the last 20 years with the invention of the Internet. When you hear the word Deep Web/ hidden data, it almost sounds like an elite access to information for government officials. I will say I initially what came to my mind was the ‘Black Web;’ an underground Web base that is full of illegal activities and conspiracy theories of political nature.
Retrieved from Google |
With anyone and everyone able to upload any information on
web pages there is more of an importance for teachers to teach children how to
sift through what is reliable information and what is not. It is great to see
that there is this thing called the ‘invisible web’ unfortunate that all parts
of the invisible web has subscription fees, what if some schools cannot afford
these fees or individuals that wish they could have access! One area I would
love to share with students is when in a goggle search putting .edu after your
search will provide more academic resources if you do not have access to the Deep Web. After reading about the ‘deep
web’ I am still lost as where to start to get access?
When it comes to searching for academic resources it can still
be overwhelming in what to put in the search. Now as an experienced student I
am able to narrow down my searches through key word searches or authors. The
UBC library catalogue for example is very well organized for a new students to
navigate through; I really appreciated the tabs for different search
collections you can look through: books/media, indexes/databases &
articles, or journals. Once you have navigated for a particular search you then
can refine your search even further through the left tabs: content type,
publication date, discipline, and subject terms. Recently I toured the main
Calgary Public Library and found out that they offer programs for students
grade 4-6 to learn how to conduct research what information is important and
how to find reliable sources. I think university libraries should also provide
similar support or mini session to help students or faculty members be able to
use the resources available to them.
One particular database that the Calgary Public Library
provides access to for the public is EBSCOhost databases as well as Gale and
Eric and a multitude of other resources.
This was all possible by a generous donations and fundraising all
memberships fees are free which will allow all residents of Calgary to have
access. For students who are doing research projects “online periodical
databases containing articles from academic journals, newspapers, popular
magazines, and other sources, all of which are searchable by subject headings
and keywords” can make the research project more accessible (Riedling, pg.89).
I was completely shocked when doing research on different
databases and the cost associated can range from $1,000-$50,000 in a year
subscription. Which when you think about it—it makes sense that it could cost
so much, there are so many different sources that have been reviewed. I really
enjoy how EBSCO has indexes and abstracts available for high school, middle
school and elementary grade level through www.ebscohost.com/schools offering
a variety of interfaces.
I am not surprised to read in Harris article that the Oxford
English Dictionary started out like a cousin to Wiki (Wikipedia). How else
would words be complied and sorted and viewed for validity back when there was
no software to do the man work? Now why is it as professionals we are taught
that Wikipedia is bad and not a reliable source? Is it because anyone can send
in submissions, is it because there is no indoctrination of correct terms? I
agree that within our current decade we are exposed to so much information with
a tape of your fingertips through sources like Wikipedia, “if a child comes home seeking help with a
research project, it’s likely that Mom and Dad will turn to the online
encyclopedia” (Harris). This is a great start for younger students to start
their search for answers, it is now the job of educators, especially Teacher
Librarians to “teach
colleagues, students, and parents how to best use Wikipedia. Instead of
appearing to be “behind the times” when it comes to new information sources”
(Harris).
Wikipedia
is known as an open source or free citizen-built encyclopedia; “open source
publishing allows writers and software developers to apply their skills outside
a strictly business environment. Casual writers and editors sometimes
participate as a hobby or learning experience” (Berinstein). Where
encyclopedias are established sources where the “contributors are chosen for
their professional expertise” (Berinstein). Both sources are essentially trying
to do the same thing, provide accurate information to help educate and expand
the populace knowledge.
See below a funny video to show students or staff on the difference between open sources and established sources.
When it comes to what source is a better source Wiki or Britannica I think
they both serve a purpose in our libraries. Berinstein’s article states how the
“Wikipedia’s audience is far more general than
that of Britannica, which implies that its mission and scope must
be so as well.” The way information is evolving with easy instant access, “Now that [Britannica] its encyclopedia is online,
changes and additions can be posted more quickly” (Berinstein) opening up the
same instant platform of accessibility of information as Wikipedia. Ideally it
would be amazing if that validated accessibility would not come at a high cost,
I think Britannica is on the right track with having an online access at a
lower cost, which in my opinion is better suited for the school library and our
push of technology. Now at the primary age I think using Wiki is a great start
for students to find information and then check that information on resources
such as Britannica encyclopedia. As always it is our duty as TL to educate
students on how to access information and check for accuracy, and authoritative
sources.
I am still a huge
advocate when it comes to print resources of any kind. I always prefer to turn
pages and physically touch a book then look at one on a screen. There is
something about the smell, texture and weight of a book that enlightens the
experience of the literature even more; maybe this is due to my initial exposure
I am not sure? When it comes to printed sources, “sometimes a dictionary or
encyclopedia is precisely what is required, regardless of format” to meet the
needs of the school community (pg. 61).
Now I understand that the
English language is always evolving and maybe it would be more economical to
use online sources that are updated regularly compared to a printed version but
I think they still hold an importance in a school library, “Although Internet
search engines satisfy our most immediate needs for information, it is often
necessary to use an authoritative source for finding facts” (pg. 37). There are
some skills that need to be taught and explored with hands on experience and
textiles and I feel that dictionaries and thesaurus are one of those skills on
how to use a resource; “the prescriptive view claims that the major role of
dictionaries is to set standards, support traditional usage, and prevent
corruption of language by jargon and slang” (pg.61). As far as I can remember
the dictionary was the first resource I ever learned how to use, and I used it
all the time and still do.
As a Teacher Librarian I
believe you must do extensive research into what works best in your school
community regarding resources and where the budget would be best allocated.
Works Cited
Berinstein, P.
(2006). Wikipedia
and Britannica: The Kid's All Right (And So's the Old Man) (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site.. Searcher 14(3), 16-26.
Riedling, Ann, Reference
skills for the school library media specialist: Tools and tips, (Third
Edition). Linworth.
Harris, C. (2007). Can
we make peace with Wikipedia? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. School Library Journal, 53(6), 26.
I agree with your comments about how confusing the transition was from the old traditional card catalog to the online catalog. But I have to say now that I am used to it I love it and would never go back to the old way of doing it--new online tools give you so many access points. The old way now seems like groping blindly in the dark.
ReplyDeleteA really well done reflection! Your look back on theme 3 and all the new terms, areas to explore, benefits and ideas was discussed with your personal connections, goals, and realizations. You highlighted some very important new skills you've gained and come to rely on, as well as contextualized your growth and awareness from those undergraduate days so long ago. A good look back on your learning this last month.
ReplyDelete